Re:Quebec refuses to reinvest in Lion Electric (busses); US ...
by TulliusCicero on Friday May 02, 2025 @03:31AM
(#43867123)
And...what exactly does this have to do with my comment, which was about how much money was being invested into manufacturing construction?
Re:Quebec refuses to reinvest in Lion Electric (busses); US ...
by mjevans on Friday May 02, 2025 @11:33AM
(#43871140)
You'd mentioned a _timeline_ of manufacturing. I'm pointing out that usually investment has a lag time and giving some examples of lag times I've seen mentioned in publications before to parallel my supposition...
That real impact from investment may be 5-10+ years from the initial funding allocation.
Re:Quebec refuses to reinvest in Lion Electric (busses); US ...
by TulliusCicero on Friday May 02, 2025 @05:51PM
(#43874905)
But I wasn't talking about results, I just pointed out that investment was way up? There's no time lag there, it's just...how much money is going in.
Re:Quebec refuses to reinvest in Lion Electric (busses); US ...
by parineum on Friday May 02, 2025 @01:31AM
(#43866482)
That's a larger reason for offshoring than wages.
Your billion dollar factory can start returning the investment years earlier when you manufacture elsewhere.
Re:Quebec refuses to reinvest in Lion Electric (busses); US ...
by mjevans on Friday May 02, 2025 @11:35AM
(#43871178)
Less red tape, easier to manage 'processes', fewer environmental / labor relations...
It's those last two, impact on the commons and unfair worker treatment, that are examples of where I _would_ support reasonable tariffs. Particularly if funds from those tariffs went to remediating the impact and were agreed to (also observed) by a majority of other leading countries / economic blocks.
That's not even considering the issues of planning, permits, installing machines, training workers, etc, in a more down to earth facility like a generic food plant, or heck forbid something seriously regulated (I hope) like making prescription drugs.