News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Haskell Is Exceptionally Unsafe by dwc on Tuesday August 14, 2012 @11:22AM (#4381334)
While what you say is true, GHC is the de facto Haskell standard. At least the last time I looked, most widely used and well respected Haskell code would only work in GHC using various extensions. That's the actual state of Haskell: GHC with non-standard extensions is the effective standard.
Re:Haskell Is Exceptionally Unsafe by sonyandy on Tuesday August 14, 2012 @11:38AM (#4381434)
An extension that GHC provides, and therefore part of the effective standard, is Safe Haskell (http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.4.2/html/users_guide/safe-...). A Safe (compiled with -XSafe, containing the LANGUAGE Safe pragma, or inferred) module may not define any manual instances of Typeable.
Re:Haskell Is Exceptionally Unsafe by akldfgj on Tuesday August 14, 2012 @11:30AM (#4381386)
There are widely used extensions and there are avoided extensions:

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/801785/should-i-use-ghc-h...