Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto...
by ncr100 on Saturday April 26, 2025 @01:45AM
(#43801224)
Yes. 150+ times is akin to Funding an individual, rather than seeking to add a unique perspective.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Wikipedia’s nonprofit status questioned by D.C. U.S. atto...
by Agraillo on Saturday April 26, 2025 @09:28AM
(#43803447)
I'd argue that there's another perspective, more complimentary to US politics. There's obviously a list of "experts" aligned with RT narrative which they use depending on the topic. No media like RT wants someone from this list to be too visible and appear too often, whether they are pay-rolled shadowy or not. So it looks like not so many "experts" are eager to be on alert on this list.