Re:I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)
by creaturemachine on Thursday April 24, 2025 @11:06AM
(#43783716)
You're paying that cent, but in the form of endless ads hijacking your consciousness.
Re:I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)
by overtomanu on Thursday April 24, 2025 @01:46PM
(#43785457)
you can still do some setup and access mail by using applications like thunderbird, which have no ads.
Re:I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)
by odo1242 on Thursday April 24, 2025 @04:22PM
(#43787077)
Or use an adblocker
Re:I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)
by tshaddox on Thursday April 24, 2025 @03:59PM
(#43786890)
Ironically, the amount of effort I expend dealing with spam from the postal service is much larger than the amount of effort I expend dealing with email.
Re:I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)
by sokoloff on Thursday April 24, 2025 @05:16PM
(#43787594)
I’m pretty sure I spend less than 5 minutes a week dealing with physical spam mail. I have a recycling bin right next to where the mail arrives and most days are 15 seconds of “these go into that bin unopened” and sometimes I have to open an envelope and glance at it to see if it’s something relevant to me.
Even with the best spam filtering on email, I’m well over 5 minutes a week of distraction from it.
Re:I wrote to the address in the GPLv2 license notice (2022)
by Misdicorl on Thursday April 24, 2025 @08:03PM
(#43788845)
And now imagine how easy dealing with email spam would be if the marginal fiscal cost was not 0 like physical spam. All the technology and tools available and less than 1% of the viable spam surface area
This is a good starting point, but if you have no barriers then you get abuse problems which is why email is terrible. I remember being horrified in the 90s about attempts to charge 1 cent per email. Now I long for a world where that actually happened.