Re:They made computers behave like annoying salesmen
by daedrdev on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @05:00PM
(#43776575)
There is a similar case in California where every year a ballot initiative is proposed to repeal a law banning local rent control. Despite it failing every election it continues to get proposed. So its not just corporations who can do this, the demos do it too.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:They made computers behave like annoying salesmen
by namaria on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @05:40PM
(#43776895)
There should be an exponential backoff rule for failing propositions.
Re:They made computers behave like annoying salesmen
by daedrdev on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @06:09PM
(#43777181)
I don't like the idea because if you notice public opinion are slowly shifting on an policy you could purposefully propose it each backoff date to entrench it for like 8 or 16 years when public perception does swap.
Re:They made computers behave like annoying salesmen
by namaria on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @06:13PM
(#43777226)
I was joking, but my serious opinion on this is that direct democracy doesn't scale. For a country like Switzerland that is basically a small patchwork of villages up in the mountains it is probably fine, but for a polity of 39 million people and one of the biggest economies on Earth I should say it's a bad fit. Maybe for some local propositions.
Re:They made computers behave like annoying salesmen
by trollbridge on Thursday April 24, 2025 @08:07PM
(#43788858)
... which is why it would be reasonable to allow local government units to implement rent control.
Re:They made computers behave like annoying salesmen
by namaria on Friday April 25, 2025 @12:41AM
(#43790154)
No, that doesn't follow at all. My point is about the scale of ballot measure not the effects. That would be for the State legislature to decide, in my opinion, not a State-wide referendum, is the point.