Re:Open Source Projects Receive Funding to Reclaim the Publi...
by nonrandomstring on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @06:10AM
(#43770383)
> What "people" want is already irrelevant
This! Software is stuck in some illusory ideal from the dotcom days, a
global market of meritous choice. It's long been political and about
sovereignty, control and security. Some comments above sing the
praises of Adobe as a "no alternative" software. So, remember that
time when Trump passed an executive order banning Adobe in South
American countries [0]?
The US does not get to use access to tech as a weapon, so they're not
good enough by wider criteria in a changing political world. It
doesn't matter how good are products by Google, Microsoft, Apple,
Adobe, Meta...
I also happen to think they're technically inferior to a diverse
inter-compatible and free ecosystem, but that's becoming a side show.
In a way its good that there are no European vendors. The coming
change cannot be mistaken for trade preference. People are being
"forced to be free" of dangerous influence [1].
This! Software is stuck in some illusory ideal from the dotcom days, a global market of meritous choice. It's long been political and about sovereignty, control and security. Some comments above sing the praises of Adobe as a "no alternative" software. So, remember that time when Trump passed an executive order banning Adobe in South American countries [0]?
The US does not get to use access to tech as a weapon, so they're not good enough by wider criteria in a changing political world. It doesn't matter how good are products by Google, Microsoft, Apple, Adobe, Meta...
I also happen to think they're technically inferior to a diverse inter-compatible and free ecosystem, but that's becoming a side show.
In a way its good that there are no European vendors. The coming change cannot be mistaken for trade preference. People are being "forced to be free" of dangerous influence [1].
[0] https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-49973337
[1] https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/rousseau/