ClickHouse gets lazier (and faster): Introducing lazy materialization

Re:ClickHouse gets lazier (and faster): Introducing lazy mat... by simonw on Tuesday April 22, 2025 @07:21PM (#43767210)

They have an interesting version that's packaged a bit like DuckDB - you can even "pip install" it: https://github.com/chdb-io/chdb

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ClickHouse gets lazier (and faster): Introducing lazy mat... by AYBABTME on Tuesday April 22, 2025 @07:46PM (#43767351)

They don't do static builds AFAICT, which would make it a real competitor to DuckDB.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ClickHouse gets lazier (and faster): Introducing lazy mat... by auxten on Tuesday April 22, 2025 @09:44PM (#43767957)

chDB author here, You are right, we have not made a static libchDB. BTW, I guess you are a golang developer?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ClickHouse gets lazier (and faster): Introducing lazy mat... by AYBABTME on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @02:29AM (#43769224)

Correct! Would love to have the Go package come as a single dependency without having to distribute `.so` files. That's what's stopping me from using `chDB` now instead of DuckDB. Being able to use chDB in a static manner would also help deepen my usage of the Clickhouse server. Right now the Clickhouse side of my project is lagging behind the DuckDB one because of this.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ClickHouse gets lazier (and faster): Introducing lazy mat... by ryadh on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @08:23AM (#43771270)

That's great feedback, thank you! I just added your comment to the GH issue: https://github.com/chdb-io/chdb/issues/101#issuecomment-2824...

Ps. I work for ClickHouse

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:ClickHouse gets lazier (and faster): Introducing lazy mat... by codedokode on Wednesday April 23, 2025 @02:21AM (#43769187)

What is the use case for an embedded terabyte-scale database, by the way?

[ Parent | on HN ]