News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Kim Dotcom - Megabox, disruptive new music service by k-mcgrady on Monday August 13, 2012 @06:32AM (#4375227)
Interested to see what 'MegaKey' is. There are only a few obvious ways to make money with free music: advertising and up-selling subscriptions. If he's managed to come up with a better way that's great. Maybe it will force Spotify and the other 'free' music services into splitting revenue more fairly rather than the current model of giving most of it to the major labels and screwing the indies.
Re:Kim Dotcom - Megabox, disruptive new music service by Zirro on Monday August 13, 2012 @07:20AM (#4375301)
"Interested to see what 'MegaKey' is."

The last time I checked, when Megaupload was still online and Megakey was being tested, it worked by replacing existing Internet-ads with ones served through the Mega-network when a person surfed the web. Essentially, it's a voluntarily installed ad-ware.

Re:Kim Dotcom - Megabox, disruptive new music service by amalcon on Monday August 13, 2012 @11:56AM (#4376473)
Ah, so it's a Gator[1] clone. Great, something else to warn people about. Gator was allegedly installed "voluntarily", but it turned out that wasn't how it usually happened...

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Claria_Corporation#Gator

Re:Kim Dotcom - Megabox, disruptive new music service by patternguru714 on Monday August 20, 2012 @07:21AM (#4407043)
The legal snafu with MegaKey is that it REPLACES ads, which, depending on situation, could easily be illegal contract interference. If it steps on banner ads and contracted ad real-estate on websites (Facebook, for example) he's stealing revenue. I'd assume if he were confronted with this, he'd play the "champion of the people" card, stating the original ads were placed there by greedy, unethical corporations and thus he's a hero. (Last part is my opinion, first part is an actual legal problem ;)
Re:Kim Dotcom - Megabox, disruptive new music service by k-mcgrady on Monday August 13, 2012 @07:36AM (#4375345)
Thanks this if the first I've heard of it. I could see that being an interesting proposition for many people (the ones who refuse to pay for any music). As someone who still buys music and subscribes to Spotify Premium there's no way I would use it.
Re:Kim Dotcom - Megabox, disruptive new music service by icebraining on Monday August 13, 2012 @08:02AM (#4375451)
Spotify is great, unless you happen to be part of the 90% of the world population that they don't support.
Re:Kim Dotcom - Megabox, disruptive new music service by k-mcgrady on Monday August 13, 2012 @08:51AM (#4375609)
It will get their eventually. It took iTunes a long time too but they are, I think, now the biggest music retailer.
Re:Kim Dotcom - Megabox, disruptive new music service by dbecker on Monday August 13, 2012 @07:32AM (#4375337)
I hope it's easy to find a list of MegaKey advertisers, so I know not to buy anything from any of them.
Re:Kim Dotcom - Megabox, disruptive new music service by corkill on Monday August 13, 2012 @06:55AM (#4375269)
At I guess I would say it's going to be advertising. e.g. megaupload except 90% of profits on downloads the artist has endorsed goes to them. Instead of 100% to megaupload.

Probably with targeted upsells for more content from the artist as well.

Re:Kim Dotcom - Megabox, disruptive new music service by iamben on Monday August 13, 2012 @07:24AM (#4375313)
I vaguely remember reading something about it at the start of the year after his arrest. If I recall correctly, the idea was you installed a program that replaced the ads on websites as you browse. By doing so you earned access to music. Something like that.

Edit: Apparently it had a trial run last year to unlock access to MU and MV. Read more: http://web.archive.org/web/20110128174342/http://megakey.com...

Re:Kim Dotcom - Megabox, disruptive new music service by vibrunazo on Monday August 13, 2012 @08:23AM (#4375522)
Youtube already does that. If you flag that you own a video you'll get money from free views on it. But it barely works because it's too easy to abuse. Real artists often can't monetize their own videos because an abuser uploaded it first and claimed as his. Youtube is being abused to hell and google can't control it.

I wonder which genius solution megabox have to suceed where google failed. Or if it's just marketing.

Re:Kim Dotcom - Megabox, disruptive new music service by jlgreco on Monday August 13, 2012 @10:17AM (#4375967)
It seems to me that artists should have a unique advantage over other people when it comes to uploading their video to youtube first. The only way they should really have an issue is if they choose not to upload it initially, but release it to the public some other way first.