Re:Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs
by terhechte on Sunday April 20, 2025 @11:59AM
(#43744600)
Or GitHub. I’m always amused when people don’t want to send fractions of their code to a LLM but happily host it on GitHub. All big llm providers offer no-training-on-your-data business plans.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs
by tarruda on Sunday April 20, 2025 @12:34PM
(#43744807)
> I’m always amused when people don’t want to send fractions of their code to a LLM but happily host it on GitHub
What amuses me even more is people thinking their code is too unique and precious, and that GitHub/Microsoft wants to steal it.
Re:Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs
by vikarti on Sunday April 20, 2025 @03:50PM
(#43746078)
Regulations sometimes matter.
Stupid "security" rules sometimes matter too.
Re:Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs
by AlexCoventry on Sunday April 20, 2025 @12:40PM
(#43744838)
Concern about platform risk in regard to Microsoft is historically justified.
Re:Gemma 3 QAT Models: Bringing AI to Consumer GPUs
by Terretta on Sunday April 20, 2025 @12:41PM
(#43744843)
Unlikely they think Microsoft or GitHub wants to steal it.
With LLMs, they're thinking of examples that regurgitated proprietary code, and contrary to everyday general observation, valuable proprietary code does exist.
But with GitHub, the thinking is generally the opposite: the worry is that the code is terrible, and seeing it would be like giant blinkenlights* indicating the way in.