News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by lazide on Sunday April 20, 2025 @08:22AM (#43743340)
Do you really think your average Nazi read Mein Kampf?

Or that your average authoritarian Christian (or Muslim!) has read their holy books?

Fanatics may pretend, but rarely actually read. After all, it may conflict with their fanaticism.

They are happy to control what everyone else is able to read though.

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by matwood on Sunday April 20, 2025 @08:32AM (#43743385)
As an atheist I often know the religious texts better than those who want to tell me I'm going to hell or whatever. As a kid I was thrown out of Sunday School for asking too many questions because I took the time to read the damn book.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by lazide on Sunday April 20, 2025 @08:58AM (#43743483)
Pro: more free time

Con: ostracized

You’re not the only one.

Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by matwood on Sunday April 20, 2025 @10:24AM (#43743964)
As an adult I haven’t come across many cons. I’m not a jerk about it unless someone tries to push their beliefs on me so it rarely comes up.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by lazide on Sunday April 20, 2025 @12:04PM (#43744631)
Sounds like you are in a place where people don’t murder each other due to apostasy or religious differences.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by immibis on Sunday April 20, 2025 @07:11PM (#43747225)
I specifically said it probably didn't but was just a generic example of a book of bad ideas.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by lazide on Monday April 21, 2025 @11:59PM (#43758972)
Care to provide an actual example then?
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by immibis on Tuesday April 22, 2025 @09:29AM (#43761901)
I'm not going to waste my time looking up the exact sources cults get their propaganda, no.
Re:Librarians Are Dangerous by fsloth on Friday April 25, 2025 @06:13AM (#43792029)
I guess we can agree that books that are too dangerous in general don’t exist then?