Re:Show HN: New world record – verified Goldbach Conjecture ...
by staunton on Saturday April 19, 2025 @05:26AM
(#43735256)
Surely, finding a counterexample would be huge news, a noteworthy advance in mathematics, and thus a great and widely praised achievement.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: New world record – verified Goldbach Conjecture ...
by ndsipa_pomu on Saturday April 19, 2025 @05:42AM
(#43735328)
It'd also be an end to the project and would make the conjecture far less interesting.
Re:Show HN: New world record – verified Goldbach Conjecture ...
by kevinventullo on Saturday April 19, 2025 @08:45AM
(#43736041)
IMO it would make the conjecture far more interesting, as it would be a surprise to most people who have thought about the problem.
Many natural questions would arise, starting with “Is this the only counterexample?”
Re:Show HN: New world record – verified Goldbach Conjecture ...
by ndsipa_pomu on Saturday April 19, 2025 @09:34AM
(#43736287)
Possibly, but it would join other false conjectures such as Euler's sum of powers conjecture - posed in 1769 and no counterexample found until 1966. There's only been three primitive counterexamples found so far.
(I got that from https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/514/conjectures-tha... which features some other false conjectures that may be of interest to you)
Re:Show HN: New world record – verified Goldbach Conjecture ...
by charlieyu1 on Sunday April 20, 2025 @09:01AM
(#43743505)
Not even the same implications. All empirical evidence strongly support the Goldbach conjecture. Any counterexample would mean an entire field of Mathematics has to be rewritten.