News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew cont... by horacemorace on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @12:27AM (#43701474)
It’s Way Better than what we had before: software vendors making even arbitrarier decisions about how to classify them.

There are far too many bad actors for us to operate as an industry with no yardstick.

Re:CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew cont... by ngneer on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @01:16AM (#43701740)
I disagree that it is Way Better than before. A judgement call is worth more than a team wasting effort chasing irrelevant pseudo-vulnerabilities being reported as vulnerabilities. A broken yardstick is worse than no yardstick.
Re:CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew cont... by grumbelbart2 on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @07:04AM (#43703844)
But that's an issue organizations bring upon themselves, by defining semi-arbitrary KPIs that are used without proper interpretation. It's not directly caused by CVEs or assigned scores. It's like blaming git that it count lines in diffs, because your company created a KPI that measures developer's based on LOC changes.
Re:CVE program faces swift end after DHS fails to renew cont... by ngneer on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @09:47AM (#43705514)
Fair point. I was not blaming CVE for the situation, simply bemoaning the situation.