Re:Whistleblower details how DOGE may have taken sensitive N...
by fourside on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @09:35AM
(#43692487)
It’s a common mistake to think that folks like the parent commenter are trying to engage in an intellectually honest discussion.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Whistleblower details how DOGE may have taken sensitive N...
by ceejayoz on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @09:41AM
(#43692580)
I'm under no illusions they're commenting in good faith, but at times I find it valuable to highlight that fact.
Re:Whistleblower details how DOGE may have taken sensitive N...
by sorcerer-mar on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @08:10PM
(#43699931)
It is valuable! Thank you for doing it.
Re:Whistleblower details how DOGE may have taken sensitive N...
by morkalork on Tuesday April 15, 2025 @09:45AM
(#43692618)
"Hark" goes the sealion, "sources?"
Re:Whistleblower details how DOGE may have taken sensitive N...
by flanked-evergl on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @02:59AM
(#43702322)
Well that is kind of the point though, I asked for sources because it is clear that the comment, containing a false and baseless claim (as evidenced by the inability to provide one single supporting source), was not intellectually honest. If we don't challenge these things, then others will start believing them.