Re:Googler... ex-Googler
by Cthulhu_ on Monday April 14, 2025 @02:47AM
(#43678680)
That's not universal though. My dad's company was bought up by a foreign investor, shrunk over multiple reorganizations from its peak of ~500 people in the 70's or 80's down to a skeleton crew of ~50. They weren't fired, they were told the company was going bankrupt and needed to be emptied out. People who worked there for 40+ years were basically given a few months' pay if that and a "good luck". There's a formula for severance pay; years worked * month's wage, this would give people a lot of leeway to find a new job or just sit out until their retirement, but of course that's very expensive so they weaseled their way out of it through various constructions. Dozens of people fired a few years before retirement, most never found another job again. And the boss kept the company, which is now a shell company / sales / license holder, which the parent company was always after of course because production is cheaper to do in e.g. Poland.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
> People who worked there for 40+ years were basically given a few months' pay
Those few months pay thing is the key difference. That is legally mandated.
You also get a few months pay in the US unless the company is truly broke.
Incorrect. It's at-will employment.
"At-will employment" is a meme here. In reality, the company gives you a few months of pay and you sign a document saying you won't sue them for firing you during a layoff.
If you get fired for fraud or for being incompetent, for example, it's often different.
Re:Googler... ex-Googler
by CoastalCoder on Monday April 14, 2025 @07:40AM
(#43680221)
That's the convention, but AFAIK it's not enshrined on law.
Some states require payout for unused, earned vacation time.
State-managed unemployment pay is also a thing, assuming the employee wasn't fired for cause. I think some states require employers to pay into this via a payroll tax.