News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Googler... ex-Googler by klooney on Saturday April 12, 2025 @10:48PM (#43669660)
> LIFO principle for layoffs, newest employees are let go first. Stack ranking not possible

Newer employees often see this as incredibly unfair.

Re:Googler... ex-Googler by SR2Z on Sunday April 13, 2025 @12:18AM (#43670060)
Because it is unfair. It just tends to benefit people employed today
Re:Googler... ex-Googler by lazide on Sunday April 13, 2025 @05:23AM (#43671373)
The only fair system is a random lottery - which is also the most terrifying for everyone.
Re:Googler... ex-Googler by int_19h on Monday April 14, 2025 @10:20PM (#43688423)
Then again, if we did have a random lottery that required all employees (up to and including the CEO) to participate, then perhaps we'd see fewer layoffs...
Re:Googler... ex-Googler by lazide on Wednesday April 16, 2025 @03:32AM (#43702550)
why would the company want that?
Re:Googler... ex-Googler by ncruces on Monday April 14, 2025 @04:20AM (#43679192)
It's not about being fair to the individual, it's about producing a better outcome for society. In this case, saving money on welfare (that's also in great measured pooled across society, not an individual account).

Parents being able to take sick days to care for their kids, or 50yo being able to take leaves to take care of their dying 80yo parents are also unfair to kids in their 20s just starting out.

Re:Googler... ex-Googler by kergonath on Monday April 14, 2025 @01:34AM (#43678362)
If it’s the rule, everyone knows it. There is no guessing about randomness or hidden variables, and ultimately less favoritism than a line manager coming up with a stack ranking.

Looking at the larger picture, what otherwise tends to happen is that older people get pushed out. Then we have a massive issue of them ending up unemployed because nobody wants to hire them. This is compounded by the retirement age being pushed further and further away.