News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:China Raises Tariffs on US Goods to 84% as Rift Escalates by dang on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @11:44AM (#43633414)
It's explicitly against the site guidelines to post like this. If you'd please review https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and stick to the rules, we'd appreciate it. Note this one: "Please don't post insinuations about astroturfing, shilling, bots, brigading, foreign agents and the like. It degrades discussion and is usually mistaken. If you're worried about abuse, email [email protected] and we'll look at the data."

It's particularly bad when internet users invoke these tropes to hound commenters with minority backgrounds out of a discussion. This has happened more than once on HN in the past, which is particularly shameful and totally against the desired spirit of the site.

I gather from https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43632625 that it wasn't your intention, but this is what gets communicated by comments like the parent, whether intended or not. These effects happen all too easily, so we need to guard against them, which is why we have that guideline.

(I'm not taking sides for or against any country or position on a topic. This is about HN being a welcoming place for people of all backgrounds.)

Re:China Raises Tariffs on US Goods to 84% as Rift Escalates by hollerith on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @12:34PM (#43634052)
OK, will change my behavior.
Re:China Raises Tariffs on US Goods to 84% as Rift Escalates by dang on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @03:26PM (#43636603)
Appreciated!
Re:China Raises Tariffs on US Goods to 84% as Rift Escalates by hollerith on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @12:49PM (#43634314)
Please confirm that it is only the one comment that did not meet HN's standards and my https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43632069 was OK.
Re:China Raises Tariffs on US Goods to 84% as Rift Escalates by dang on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @03:26PM (#43636600)
It wasn't great because it was (1) generic and (2) on the border of nationalistic flamewar, but it's not one we would post a moderation reply to.