That depends very much on which of the dozen+ definitions of "agent" you are using.
Re:The Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A)
by knowaveragejoe on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @10:40AM
(#43632676)
I think Anthropic does a good job of nailing it down to two definitions, one of which is very commonly referred to as agents but more appropriately called _workflows_, and this is the vast majority of what you'll see in the wild.
https://www.anthropic.com/engineering/building-effective-age...
Re:The Agent2Agent Protocol (A2A)
by alittletooraph2 on Wednesday April 09, 2025 @10:46AM
(#43632743)
agents are just the rebranded version of automated workflows and sometimes its an LLM doing the validation
I read about them only for hypothetical scenarios. Is it a real thing?