Re:Show HN: I Built ImgFiber-Better Image Optimizer. Free No...
by iambavith on Sunday April 06, 2025 @07:10AM
(#43600556)
Ohh, Optimage and ImageOptim are different. thanks for pointing that out! We just came acrross imageoptim thanks to your comment. interesting to see how it offers subscriptions.
JPEG-XL definitely way to go. we’re exploring ways to integrate support for formats like JXL and AVIF soon.
Near lossless is a better fit?
Original JPEG: 250KB
Your file: 236KB 91.547 (0.00597462)%
Optimage (not ImageOptim): 243KB (0 difference, I have been using it for years but lacks of output as AVIF and JXL)
Re-compressed with JXL with no quality loss: 209KB (Can even reconstruct back to JPEG)
The other issues with being 16-bit or 10-bit could downgrade to 8-bit channels, which might catch someone by surprise if they aren't familiar with the differences. JPEG-XL is more future-proof (long-term archival) for both JPEG and lossless images.