Re:Daring Fireball: App.net
by H_L on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @11:34PM
(#4359396)
App.net is not Twitter. It's an infrastructure, upon which new social services can bloom. It's AWS.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
We have infrastructure. It's called AWS. The infrastructure of App.net is not revolutionary or even that interesting. Why do new social services need this infrastructure?
Re:Daring Fireball: App.net
by dinkumthinkum on Thursday August 09, 2012 @04:42AM
(#4360175)
So that doesn't make sense. If I have a website running on AWS, do I have my users pay AWS for me?