Re:Dijkstra On the foolishness of "natural language programm...
by kfajdsl on Thursday April 03, 2025 @12:29PM
(#43572092)
Haven’t tried copilot but cursor is pretty good at telling me where things are and explaining the high level architecture of medium-largeish codebases, especially if I already vaguely know what I’m looking for. I use this a lot when I need to change some behavior of an open source project that I’m using but previously haven’t touched.
Re:Dijkstra On the foolishness of "natural language programm...
by yencabulator on Thursday April 03, 2025 @02:01PM
(#43573250)
I was actually positively surprised at how well even qwen2.5-coder:7b managed to talk through a file of Rust. I'm still a current-day-LLM-programming skeptic but that direction, code->English, seems a lot safer, since English is ambiguous anyway. For example, it recognized some of the code shapes and gave English names that can be googled easier.
In my experience this function is quite useless. It will just repeat the code in plain English. It will not explain it.