The strange thing here is that you've chosen to defend the indefensible on the grounds of trying to "both sides" something that really is only from one side.

Not only it's not "indedensible", but the full unedited transcript proves it was perfectly sane.

The site was of course trash, but from what I remember he was asking if people gave themselves sunburn would it kill covid.

His words to me felt they were those of a typical 5 year old, or an 80 year old with dementia, asking questions about subjects he doesn't understand but desperately trying to fit in.

But no, he did then ask about injecting a disinfectant.

Now it's quite possible Trump doesn't know the meaning of the word "disinfectant".

In the same press conference he also asked if "heat and light" will get rid of covid.

(Although of course he says this as "suggestions" and the "I'm just asking questions" tactic)

The author presents arguments, with the evidence. If you're able to understand the argument, you can decide for yourself. Nothing else matters. As to why there are so many debunks, you'd have to ask the mainstream media why they've done this so much.

No. I have watched the full press briefing. Res ipsa loquitur.