News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by otterley on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @03:59PM (#43560868)
What kind of evidence would satisfy you, then?
Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by dooglius on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @04:19PM (#43561049)
I have `showdead` enabled. It should not be the case that I find flagged posts that are good -- that are well written, don't break rules, etc -- but are flagged (presumably) due to expressing a dissenting view.
Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by pvg on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @04:42PM (#43561290)
That ‘presumably’ is doing a lot of lifting and would be better supported by some examples of such posts.
Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by dooglius on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @08:06PM (#43563287)
That's fair from your perspective -- although the parent's question is what would subjectively satisfy me. I don't keep a log of such instances, and I don't see a way to view my vouched posts, but it is something I observe often enough.
Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by pvg on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @08:16PM (#43563352)
Sure, but the reason that question is being raised is so that we can decide for ourselves how good your evidence is - both conceptually and concretely. It certainly doesn't mean you have to share it but it makes the discussion actually meaningful.

Your vouched items should be visible to you at https://news.ycombinator.com/vouched?id=dooglius

Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by dooglius on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @10:22PM (#43564028)
Ah, I meant comments rather than posts (and I think flagging posts has a different meaning since one cannot downvote posts) but it looks like comments are visible by adding `&kind=comment`. Anyway, the most recent comment I vouched is https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43530295 which I think is a good example of what I'm talking about.
Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by mh- on Thursday April 03, 2025 @12:15AM (#43564680)
Does that link only show vouched items of some recency? The page is literally blank (minus header and footer) for me, but it's probably been a week or so since I vouched a comment.

edit: sorry, I missed the sibling comment to this. I only ever come across dead comments, not posts. So I needed to add &kind=comment to see vouched comments.

Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by MrMcCall on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @06:31PM (#43562484)
Feel free to peruse my comments; you'll find all the examples you need.

The people here are rather anti-compassion and any kind of spirituality.

And how I was attacked for calling David Lynch a worthless purveyor of ultraviolence and vapid, wasteful lifestyles was unconscionable.

And I am so rate-limited that I can't even respond to the attacks.

You have made enough money to create an echo chamber, and a necessary part of that is keeping the naysayers out. As dang told me once, the algorithm is functioning as specified.

I'd love to hear about all the good your companies have done for people with the money you've made.

Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by otterley on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @06:55PM (#43562723)
The person you’re responding to is not Paul Graham. Similar handle but not identical.

> The people here are rather anti-compassion and any kind of spirituality. And how I was attacked for calling David Lynch a worthless purveyor of ultraviolence and vapid, wasteful lifestyles was unconscionable.

Maybe your problem is not with your opinions but with how you choose to express them. My observation is that disagreement is rarely downvoted massively if it is expressed eloquently. OTOH, emotional and brief conclusory opinions that aren’t supported with narratives or supporting information that are also contrarian may be subject to mass downvoting.

Looking through your comment history, I think you’re experiencing this phenomenon not because you respectfully disagree with others, but because of the quality of your communication.

Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by pvg on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @07:12PM (#43562870)
The person you’re responding to is not Paul Graham.

We're all Paul Graham! https://youtu.be/FKCmyiljKo0?t=65

Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by MrMcCall on Thursday April 03, 2025 @02:22AM (#43565487)
That sure explains a lot!
Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by gus_massa on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @09:23PM (#43563680)
You can vouch it, and if the comment is still [dead] but it's really good you can send an email to dang and tomhow [email protected] Remember to include a link to the comment, and use it sparsely because it's a manual processes.
Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by mh- on Thursday April 03, 2025 @12:14AM (#43564674)
Like the parent commenter, I frequently see high quality posts via showdead. I vouch them, but I've never seen one resurrected soon after. I rarely remember to go back and check hours later, but by then the thread has died down anyway.
Re:Tell HN: Announcing tomhow as a public moderator by gus_massa on Thursday April 03, 2025 @09:49AM (#43569609)
It takes a few vouches to unkill a comment. (The exact number is a mystery (I don't remember dang telling the number ever) and it may change from time to time (or not).)

For not-bad comments just vouch them, but for very-good-I-will-not-be-able-to-sleep-until-it-is-unkilled comments vouch and send an email.