News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Sports supplement creatine makes no difference to muscle ... by cratermoon on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @09:50AM (#43556682)
This is correct. There are two main biological activities involving creatine, a combination of amino acids: 1. it facilitates recycling of ADP back to ATP, obviously more ATP means more energy, meaning ability to do more reps 2. it acts as a pH buffer, countering the fatigue effects of lactic acid buildup.

So no, taking creatine without doing the work probably won't make a difference (except to your wallet), but use in conjunction with consistent and effective exercise, the effect is real.

One thing though: don't bother with the creatine loading phase, it's a marketing scheme to sell more product.

Re:Sports supplement creatine makes no difference to muscle ... by wqweto on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @11:05AM (#43557502)
> taking creatine without doing the work probably won't make a difference (except to your wallet)

Creatine is dirt cheap. Anything expensive is probably a scam.

Re:Sports supplement creatine makes no difference to muscle ... by kjkjadksj on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @12:08PM (#43558239)
Assuming your body doesn’t form a dependency to it somehow and becomes sluggish weening off of it.
Re:Sports supplement creatine makes no difference to muscle ... by maerF0x0 on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @10:49AM (#43557333)
I would add 3. There's an aesthetic change too. (Obviously a preference/eye of the beholder thing).

ChatGPT: "This process, known as cell volumization, contributes to muscle size gains."

So there's also that reason to take it :)

Re:Sports supplement creatine makes no difference to muscle ... by DataDaoDe on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @10:17AM (#43556965)
Agreed. If memory serves, most studies have shown marginal effects ~ 5%, particularly for strength. The benefit of creatine it seems at least partially, is the marginal benefit of being able to squeeze out a few extra reps per week