Re:Sports supplement creatine makes no difference to muscle ...
by wqweto on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @11:05AM
(#43557502)
> taking creatine without doing the work probably won't make a difference (except to your wallet)
Creatine is dirt cheap. Anything expensive is probably a scam.
Re:Sports supplement creatine makes no difference to muscle ...
by kjkjadksj on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @12:08PM
(#43558239)
Assuming your body doesn’t form a dependency to it somehow and becomes sluggish weening off of it.
Re:Sports supplement creatine makes no difference to muscle ...
by maerF0x0 on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @10:49AM
(#43557333)
I would add 3. There's an aesthetic change too. (Obviously a preference/eye of the beholder thing).
ChatGPT: "This process, known as cell volumization, contributes to muscle size gains."
So there's also that reason to take it :)
Re:Sports supplement creatine makes no difference to muscle ...
by DataDaoDe on Wednesday April 02, 2025 @10:17AM
(#43556965)
Agreed. If memory serves, most studies have shown marginal effects ~ 5%, particularly for strength. The benefit of creatine it seems at least partially, is the marginal benefit of being able to squeeze out a few extra reps per week
So no, taking creatine without doing the work probably won't make a difference (except to your wallet), but use in conjunction with consistent and effective exercise, the effect is real.
One thing though: don't bother with the creatine loading phase, it's a marketing scheme to sell more product.