Samsung internal document evaluating the iPhone (translated)

Re:Samsung internal document evaluating the iPhone (translated) by josephlord on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @05:33AM (#4354687)

Double wow. This is a March 2010 document and the iPhone has already got copy and paste (was that iOS 3 or 4?). That means Samsung and Android had already been playing catch up for several years to get to this stage, this wasn't a comparison of their first prototype.

It is also disappointing that Samsung wasn't pointing out the iPhone and challenging their designers to do even better rather than trying to match Apple. Although maybe that happened later for the S2 and S3 development programmes.

Also without a good example to follow (although there were plenty of bad ones which probably all had some good parts) it is impressive how much Apple got right from the very beginning.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Samsung internal document evaluating the iPhone (translated) by youngtaff on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @08:39AM (#4355186)

Based on Wikipedia, Android got copy and past marginally before iOS (April 2009 vs June 2009)

From my personal experience Android copy and paste is more reliable than iOS - I get quite a few web pages on iOS where I can't mark text to copy, turning JS often gets around this

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Samsung internal document evaluating the iPhone (translated) by josephlord on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @09:18AM (#4355333)

I wasn't claiming copy and paste was first on Apple (or even best) but I recall that it wasn't there to start with which made me go back and check the date on this document. I had originally assumed it was a much earlier document and the Samsung interface being benchmarked was an internal prototype of a first generation Android but it seems it was an actual product and probably not the first (although I don't have mobile phone model histories in my head).

[ Parent | on HN ]