News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:White House says it's 'case closed' on the Signal group c... by John23832 on Tuesday April 01, 2025 @08:38AM (#43546057)
Except that the Houthis have actually shot down US assets.

https://www.defensenews.com/news/your-military/2024/09/16/ho...

So opesec, against all enemies, is important. Not just for diplomatic and political reasons. For OPERATIONAL (the op in opsec) reasons.

Re:White House says it's 'case closed' on the Signal group c... by ty6853 on Tuesday April 01, 2025 @09:50AM (#43546773)
Their extraordinarily rare shoot down have not served as a defense against our bombing campaigns. It is operationally meaningless.
Re:White House says it's 'case closed' on the Signal group c... by Arnt on Tuesday April 01, 2025 @01:17PM (#43549269)
I think that is correct, but how can defense against a meaningless campaign be meaningful?

Perhaps you can explain the operational meaning of the bombing campaign.

Re:White House says it's 'case closed' on the Signal group c... by adammarples on Tuesday April 01, 2025 @04:08PM (#43550824)
It's not an adequate defence but you should concede that a serious military do not actually want their best pilots and multilmillion dollar war fighting planes shot down? It is at the very least embarrassing.
Re:White House says it's 'case closed' on the Signal group c... by sorcerer-mar on Tuesday April 01, 2025 @08:52AM (#43546206)
And not using expiring messages on Signal is important also for record retention requirements.