Re:Google's Autonomous cars complete 300,000 miles without a...
by Someone on Tuesday August 07, 2012 @06:03PM
(#4352591)
I would think the reverse. Why own a car if you can get a taxi at your door in the size/shape/color of your choice whenever you need one without having to pay for the taxi driver?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google's Autonomous cars complete 300,000 miles without a...
by UK-AL on Tuesday August 07, 2012 @08:05PM
(#4353104)
A taxi is a car.
Re:Google's Autonomous cars complete 300,000 miles without a...
by Someone on Wednesday August 08, 2012 @06:33AM
(#4354836)
You are right, but I am, too :-). In my mind, a taxi also is public transportation. I do not think I am alone in that. Wikipedia disagrees with it in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_transport ("as distinct from modes such as taxicab"), but http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taxicab talks of "modes of public transport" for taxicabs. I guess the terminology will become more confused if/when driverless cars become commonplace.