News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:California AG Rob Bonta Urgently Issues Consumer Alert fo... by rchaud on Saturday March 22, 2025 @03:32PM (#43448028)
Google the search engine could exist without being a privacy pest. But once Google bought DoubleClick in 2002 and made their ad delivery platform their own, going down the panopticon path became inevitable.
Re:California AG Rob Bonta Urgently Issues Consumer Alert fo... by nukem222 on Saturday March 22, 2025 @03:42PM (#43448086)
I agree generally, but I was under the impression they had explicitly committed to ads over other revenue forms much earlier. Importantly, there was a point in Google's history where they weren't committed to this, and the internet would look a lot different had they not just assumed ads would be sufficient from the start.

Curiously, they had a solution of sorts in a program where you could basically bid for your own ad buys to remove ads from pages. For some reason they shuttered this program down. I didn't even know it existed until after it was gone, frustratingly. I thought it was a neat way to allow the industry bridge to other funding models.

(Or perhaps such a business model relies on tracking that's been deemed invasive. Who knows.)

Re:California AG Rob Bonta Urgently Issues Consumer Alert fo... by treyd on Sunday March 23, 2025 @05:47PM (#43456164)
> Curiously, they had a solution of sorts in a program where you could basically bid for your own ad buys to remove ads from pages. For some reason they shuttered this program down.

Because in reality this is just an opt in donation to Google. It's always cheaper to just block ads entirely.

Re:California AG Rob Bonta Urgently Issues Consumer Alert fo... by eek2121 on Saturday March 22, 2025 @03:58PM (#43448192)
Agreed.