News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fine-tune Google's Gemma 3 by fragmede on Friday March 21, 2025 @05:44AM (#43433657)
Wanting it to be bad reeks of copium.
Re:Fine-tune Google's Gemma 3 by 317070 on Saturday March 22, 2025 @10:18AM (#43445765)
Why would I want it to be bad? I'm afraid I don't understand what you mean.
Re:Fine-tune Google's Gemma 3 by fragmede on Sunday March 23, 2025 @06:12AM (#43451972)
you wrote, emphatically, that it would be "still not very good". Why do you believe that it would be still not very good after training on a specific problem? LLMs aren't able to do things outside their training data, as vast as it is, but if it's in it's training data, why are you emphatic that it's still not very good? If I ask it to make something that it just needs to copy out sample code of, it would be pretty good at that one very specific task to me.