Re:The Burnout Machine
by nosefurhairdo on Thursday March 20, 2025 @06:46PM
(#43429936)
I don't need my employer for that either, because they're competing for my labor in a market with many other employers. It would be extremely costly to replace me because of the critical role I have on a highly profitable product. If anything, I'm the one with leverage, which I use every year to request more pay, fancier titles, and larger responsibilities.
Realistically, if I were laid off today I'd likely land a better paying job than this one. I choose to stay because I like my boss, my work, and my coworkers.
If circumstances changed such that it made sense to lay me off then I should be laid off. Why should anyone be obligated to pay my salary if I'm not offering commensurate value?
Good for you. You’d still have all that and even more leverage with a union. And so would all your fellow SEs instead of only you.
> It would be extremely costly to replace me because of the critical role I have on a highly profitable product.
> If circumstances changed such that it made sense to lay me off
Companies don't always do things that make sense.
Get some financial discipline and arrange an emergency fund covering at least 6 months of expenses. It's amazing how much less leverage your employer is able to exert if you can make good on a threat of leaving.
Or you could have leverage from a union and not have to seriously consider quitting every time you need something from your employer.
You need your employer to stay fed and housed.
There is a lot more downside for you than your employer, thus a massive power asymmetry. The only way to restore the balance is solidarity between workers and it’s usually a union (or a guild)