News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:French researcher denied entry for a personal opinion on ... by mdp2021 on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @08:10PM (#43418641)
What do you mean «Neither case would be good»? Not clear.

Example: Gary Marcus wrote six weeks ago, «single-minded obsession with cutting costs is going to cripple science and American universities, with horrific lasting consequences» - that falls into your «...actions being horrible for research», but how does it fit with your statement of a "good case".

Re:French researcher denied entry for a personal opinion on ... by None4U on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @08:14PM (#43418657)
I imagine something like neither case (of getting arrested for such) would be good
Re:French researcher denied entry for a personal opinion on ... by cge on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @09:51PM (#43419206)
Speaking of statements open to misinterpretation... sorry, as the other commenter imagined, I meant that refusing entry for either type of statement would not be good, but one would be worse than the other.
Re:French researcher denied entry for a personal opinion on ... by cryptonector on Thursday March 20, 2025 @04:07PM (#43428265)
Refusing a foreigner entry for inciting violence (even against people who are not Americans and not in the U.S.) would be perfectly fine with me, though I don't approve of demanding foreigners make all their communications available to CBP (which is basically how we got here).