News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by weberer on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @06:28AM (#43410196)
>"We're going to stand by for splashdown located in the Gulf of America," she said.

>Ah, yes. The Gulf of America.

>This is why we can't have nice things.

That doesn't sound like an "excellent journalist". It sounds like a Redditor.

Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by Gareth321 on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @08:13AM (#43410870)
I cringed reading that. It's like something an edgy West coast teenage Redditor would write.
Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by pavlov on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @09:03AM (#43411349)
Yeah, instead of evaluating a journalist by looking at over a decade of high-quality work he has done writing about this space, let’s pull up a joke from one article and judge that.

Do you realize that you’re the one behaving like a low-quality Redditor here.

Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by seanw444 on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @10:50AM (#43412759)
> That doesn't sound like an "excellent journalist". It sounds like a Redditor.

We're not talking about their >decade of work. We're talking about this work, and this work sounds like a Redditor.

Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by rpmisms on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @12:31PM (#43414181)
You're arguing from priors. I respect Berger's work, but it doesn't exempt him from acting like a pillock, clearly.
Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by 93po on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @09:28AM (#43411674)
Basically any online article site like ars comes across as a Redditor with reddit-tier takes and a mixture of ChatGPT. If you graduate to something like the NYT then you sound like a lobbyist.
Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by abecedarius on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @10:46AM (#43412705)
Berger wrote two books on SpaceX in a very positive light generally, portraying Musk as extraordinarily driven and capable though not passing over less admirable traits. Berger is not a hater.
Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by pizzafeelsright on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @11:53AM (#43413631)
Prior to DOGE? That is really the question.

Once a favorable celebrity wears the Red or ventures near the Orange the script is rewritten.

Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by llamaimperative on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @01:12PM (#43414688)
True integrity is being a fan of someone no matter what they do or say, indefinitely into the future
Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by avhon1 on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @03:57PM (#43416596)
You can easily look this stuff up:

Liftoff was published January 3, 2023

Reentry was published September 2024

https://www.harpercollins.com/products/liftoff-eric-berger?v...

https://benbellabooks.com/shop/reentry/

Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by altcognito on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @12:07PM (#43413843)
An excellent journalist recognizes that the President can't unilaterally rename internationally recognized bodies of water.

What is the complaint? You don't like the style of rebuking this ridiculous behavior?

Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by FifteenthLetter on Saturday March 22, 2025 @12:47AM (#43443646)
>the President can't unilaterally rename internationally recognized bodies of water

I'm curious if you were complaining when Barack Obama renamed Mt. McKinley.

Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by altcognito on Tuesday March 25, 2025 @01:21PM (#43473668)
Not even remotely the same situation.

#1 It wasn't just the President, it was literally the state of Alaska that had made the request for four decades. #2 This is within US borders.

Re:Crew-9 Returns to Earth by beej71 on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @12:27PM (#43414129)
Ad hominem.