News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones by Nextgrid on Tuesday March 18, 2025 @02:00PM (#43402573)
It doesn't need to be a plugin ecosystem - no third party code needs to run within the iMessage processes/sandboxes/containers. In fact, no third-party code needs to run at all on the phone - all that's needed is to expose an API over BLE that allows previously authorized external devices to query/send messages.
Re:Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones by usrusr on Tuesday March 18, 2025 @03:02PM (#43403484)
In defense of the "it's security!" position (which is not mine): I think they mean a similar vulnerability could exist on the client side of the API. As in someone sends manipulated media that targets a vulnerability on the third party device, the media gets forwarded through the API, now that compromised third party device does bad things over the API.

Personally, I think that it's really just a convenient third party lockout excuse, but the argument isn't quite as bad as it may seem at first glance.

Re:Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones by darkwater on Tuesday March 18, 2025 @05:17PM (#43405241)
Following that line of reasoning, the Apple should ban WhatsApp and other messaging systems because they can add potential vulnerabilities.
Re:Apple restricts Pebble from being awesome with iPhones by xigoi on Wednesday March 19, 2025 @02:50AM (#43408912)
Don’t give them ideas!