Its a real shame we let Americans destroy it.

I blame the consumers mostly. The N900 had the same graphics chip as the iPhone at the time, but that didn't stop my cousin from turning around to me and saying "uh, why did you buy that ugly phone?"

I actually met David Potter of Symbian fame once (he was the Chair of a research hospital in London), and asked him what happened to Symbian, who were the Nokia predecessor/successor/around at the time.

I can't quite remember his answer but it was something to do with different factions within Symbian unwilling to change for the future when it was clear that their best devs had already left for greener pastures.

So I think that time period, in general, had a lot of shifting moods both at the dev level and within consumer patterns, that led to the ultimate downfall of maemo

I don't think that's at all what consumers care about. Cell phones need to be approved by the carrier to even run on the network, and of those approved only a small subset is sold and subsidized by the carrier. Combine that with the small number of carriers allowed to operate in most regions, and you end up with a very limited number of products that the hobbled market can support, regardless of the volume. The real market is between the manufacturers and the carriers, not the manufacturers and end users.

There's all sorts of crazy tablets, laptops, and handheld computers at any given time, but even large conglomerates struggle to keep their phones available through cellular carriers.

Meanwhile, companies that are very successful with stagnant and feature-limited cellphone designs have to put much more effort into computers and tablets to get a reasonably market share. Apple kept lightning ports on their cellphones long after their tablets supported USB-C, despite effectively being the same hardware, sans cellular modem.

> Cell phones need to be approved by the carrier to even run on the network

That's a U.S. of A. thing.

I'm very surprised to hear this. What gain do carriers have in locking themselves down to specific vendors? I'm a paying customer and my device can connect to your network, why would you refuse me service?

Carriers use emergency services regulations to assert that unapproved devices should not be permitted to place or receive calls. The carriers claim they'd be liable if someone should dial 911 and the device doesn't function well enough for first responders to respond, and the only solution they proffer is device validation testing.

That's mental. Weak reply, I know, but... that's mental.