News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A 10x Faster TypeScript by neonsunset on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @12:14PM (#43333965)
In a complex projects like this, Go requires manual scripting and build-time code generation. Arguably, writing a small shim project in C# is much easier. You don't exactly do a lot of JSON serialization in a compiler either way. Other than that - F# "just works" and does not require anything extra. It is just IL after all.

The most important part here is that TypeScript at Microsoft is a "first-party" customer. This means if they need additional compiler accommodations to improve their project experience from .NET, they could just raise it and they will be treated with priority. This decision is technically and politically unsound at multiple levels at once. For example, they will need good WASM support. .NET's existing WASM support is considered "decent" and even that one is far from stellar, yet considered way ahead the Go one. All they needed is to allocate additional funding for the ongoing already working NativeAOT-LLVM-WASM prototype to very quickly get the full support of the target they needed. But alas.

Re:A 10x Faster TypeScript by pjmlp on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @12:36PM (#43334240)
I already hinted on BlueSky that they shouldn't wonder why .NET has adoption problems outside the traditional Windows ecosystem, when decisions like these are taken.
Re:A 10x Faster TypeScript by neonsunset on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @12:39PM (#43334280)
The nightmare of Midori never ends. And especially right as the platform, from the technical standpoint, is getting really good(tm).