Re:Music labels will regret coming for the Internet Archive,...
by badlibrarian on Monday March 10, 2025 @10:31PM
(#43328581)
It may be bad policy but it's not fraudulent.
Running a deficit can be profitable long term -- or not. It depends on how the funds are allocated. Ask Bezos.
Likewise a tax writeoff can increase tax revenue over the long term -- or not. It depends how the tax savings are applied. Ask the employees who still have their jobs.
Regardless, a media company struggling to breakeven with cartoon coyotes may not be the best starting point for an economics debate.
Re:Music labels will regret coming for the Internet Archive,...
by nerdponx on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @08:22AM
(#43331724)
It's fraudulent in the sense that it's a fake loss, as you say created by clever accounting.
Re:Music labels will regret coming for the Internet Archive,...
by badlibrarian on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @09:44AM
(#43332377)
That's not what I said. For avoidance of doubt, allow me to rephrase the concept in the local language: paying a bunch of artists and engineers to build an app that generates minimal revenue, pulling it from the app store, then writing off the loss, is neither clever nor fraudulent.
Re:Music labels will regret coming for the Internet Archive,...
by nerdponx on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @10:03AM
(#43332553)
Right, I get what you said.
I am arguing that it is in fact a fraud perpetrated against the taxpayer, even if it's not legally categorized as "fraud" at this time.
Re:Music labels will regret coming for the Internet Archive,...
by badlibrarian on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @10:58AM
(#43333113)
Why is writing off a loss fraudulent? This very website is funded by such actions.
So-called fiscal conservatives should be howling in Congress about this kind of thing. (Narrator: they aren't.)