News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s by goodluckchuck on Sunday March 09, 2025 @01:26PM (#43311389)
What exactly was Europe’s problem? Did they not invite war by promising to provide only ineffective assistance to Ukraine? Which European nation does not have nukes? Which cannot flatten Moscow? Yet none even implied a willingness to do what it would take to prevent an invasion. Either win or lose. There is no honor in sending millions of young men to die.
Re:US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s by bufferoverflow on Monday March 10, 2025 @02:21AM (#43317495)
Most European nations don't have nukes.

If Russia overruns Ukraine (which, I really hope, they won't be able to), their next targets are Moldova, Kazakhstan, Georgia, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia.

Will Europe start a nuclear war over any of these countries being invaded? Doubt it.

Re:US Ends Support For Ukrainian F-16s by goodluckchuck on Monday March 10, 2025 @08:02AM (#43319622)
I’m talking about rhetoric and deterrence and values. When Putin was building up for war, the US was saying we’d provide money and “defensive” weapons. That’s basically an invitation. It’s saying we won’t do what it takes to win. That’s fine. If we don’t care enough to prevent it, then we can own that and let it happen without millions dying. Or, if we really won’t let that happen, then we can make that the reality and again save millions of lives.

I don’t understand how Europe seems to think that a world war among nuclear powers is the least-risky approach. If we keep fighting someone is going to start using them anyway.