Re:US support to maintain UK's nuclear arsenal is in doubt
by mopsi on Sunday March 09, 2025 @10:36AM
(#43309348)
Except that no-one put nukes or conventional missiles in Eastern Europe, so the entire point is moot.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:US support to maintain UK's nuclear arsenal is in doubt
by wakawaka28 on Sunday March 09, 2025 @08:35PM
(#43315551)
The missile thing is just the most extreme example. There are many military advantages conveyed by proximity. We already put nuclear-capable F-16s in Ukraine for example. Those could easily be used in a massive attack.
Re:US support to maintain UK's nuclear arsenal is in doubt
by mopsi on Monday March 10, 2025 @05:19PM
(#43326223)
> We already put nuclear-capable F-16s in Ukraine for example.
So no missiles, no missile bases. The best you can come up with are a bunch of old fighter jets delivered a full decade after Russia invaded, to shoot down cruise missiles and drones launched at Ukrainian cities. Proves the point.