Re:US support to maintain UK's nuclear arsenal is in doubt
by mopsi on Sunday March 09, 2025 @08:49AM
(#43308660)
> It doesn't lack substance.
Yes, it does. Nobody put missiles in Eastern Europe. That's a simple, irrefutable fact. Your salvo of similarly unsubstantiated Russian propaganda does not change that one bit.
> Cuba is not a blueprint. It's just a vaguely similar situation.
No, not even vaguely. The people who bring up the Cuban missile crisis are usually unaware that only nuclear missiles were removed from Cuba in the aftermath. Cuba did not become neutral or expel the Soviet military. Cuba remained allied with the USSR and continued to host a significant presence of Soviet conventional forces. If Cuba could host Soviet fighter jets less than 10 minutes from Miami for decades, then I don't see why Ukraine can't do the same.
>Nobody put any missiles in Eastern Europe. That's a worn-out Russian talking point that lacks any substance.
It doesn't lack substance. They seriously worry about that. And like I said, it is only half the story. Another huge issue for them is that US interests interfered in Ukrainian politics to destabilize relations with Russia, which was set to deprive them of bases that they were set to have in Ukraine. Another issue had to do with the Nazi leadership of Ukraine. Another had to do with shelling of Russian-speaking civilians in the Donbas and elsewhere in eastern Ukraine. The Nazism and attacks on civilians were covered by even the Western press until our side decided they wanted to fight a war in Ukraine. Then all of that information was brushed under the rug so that we could claim we were supporting the good guys.