News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Anthropic raises $3.5B at $61.5B valuation by jstummbillig on Friday March 07, 2025 @01:32PM (#43292795)
Do tell. How is it better than Cursor, Windsurf or (probably closest) Aider? Does it do anything the former don't, that was not possible before? I did not really understand the value prop, but am super interested to learn more.
Re:Anthropic raises $3.5B at $61.5B valuation by rolisz on Friday March 07, 2025 @01:46PM (#43292958)
I don't like Cursor, because I like PyCharm as my very awesome IDE. Claude Code is a terminal app, it's something that I just issue commands to and it mostly works, and then I check everything in PyCharm.

I tried Aider a couple of months ago and it gave me crappy code. Maybe it was the model I used back then, but I didn't like it. I had much better experience with Claude Code.

Re:Anthropic raises $3.5B at $61.5B valuation by MyOutfitIsVague on Friday March 07, 2025 @02:07PM (#43293201)
There are valid criticisms of Aider (I feel like it might use more tokens than it needs to, but I haven't done a lot of comparisons), but output quality is certainly the model.
Re:Anthropic raises $3.5B at $61.5B valuation by bredren on Friday March 07, 2025 @01:52PM (#43293032)
Are you running it from the built-in terminal in PyCharm? I also use that IDE and want to give this a swing.

Can you elaborate on "check everything in pycharm?"

Re:Anthropic raises $3.5B at $61.5B valuation by voidsnax on Friday March 07, 2025 @02:42PM (#43293665)
Before Claude Code, out of the alternatives you mentioned, I'd only tried Windsurf. I find Claude Code to be roughly comparable to Windsurf in terms of capabilities, but I can use it from my terminal. I'm much more at home in a terminal than I am in VSCode (which Windsurf is a fork of).
Re:Anthropic raises $3.5B at $61.5B valuation by dhc02 on Friday March 07, 2025 @03:16PM (#43294042)
Oh wow you owe it to yourself to try aider then. Architect mode especially, where you use one (usually reasoning) model to plan and one (usually Claude) to write code, is pretty awesome.
Re:Anthropic raises $3.5B at $61.5B valuation by paxys on Friday March 07, 2025 @02:15PM (#43293310)
Cursor's in-house models are vastly inferior to GPT or Claude. I bet the majority of Cursor users are still using one of these two under the hood.
Re:Anthropic raises $3.5B at $61.5B valuation by Kiro on Friday March 07, 2025 @02:43PM (#43293670)
Yes, but the question was about Claude Code and not the underlying model.
Re:Anthropic raises $3.5B at $61.5B valuation by ranscendental50 on Friday March 07, 2025 @01:35PM (#43292842)
Nope -- he's giving us his personal feedback and experience. I agree with him. I dislike Cursor and Windsurf and enjoy Claude Code alot.

Bother to try it for yourself, and make your own decision. I know it make actually be a bit of work...but you'll probably find everyone has their own style from the web API, to some IDE. No need to be so hostile.

Re:Anthropic raises $3.5B at $61.5B valuation by nickthegreek on Friday March 07, 2025 @01:42PM (#43292924)
I do not read hostility there, just directness. He has a valid inquiry and states he is interested to learn more. Assume good faith.
Re:Anthropic raises $3.5B at $61.5B valuation by j_bum on Friday March 07, 2025 @02:05PM (#43293171)
Agree. Not sure how, “I’m super interested to learn more,” indicates hostility.
Re:Anthropic raises $3.5B at $61.5B valuation by sundarurfriend on Friday March 07, 2025 @02:16PM (#43293330)
I think ranscendental50's reply itself was unnecessarily hostile and don't agree with the way they responded, but I can see why they assumed hostility. "Do tell" is unfortunately to a large extent used passive aggressively on the Internet, and generally actually means "Don't bother telling me, you're obviously ignorant".

This seems to be a case where it's meant genuinely, but it's not surprising that not everyone picked up on that.