News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Succinct Data Structures by gwd on Friday March 07, 2025 @04:19AM (#43288543)
It never has, it always will. We've already lost a host of words that meant "I'm not exaggerating, I actually mean it": "really", "very", etc. I'm going to keep up the fight.
Re:Succinct Data Structures by Zecc on Friday March 07, 2025 @04:55AM (#43288787)
Since there are _literally_ people who use, and have been using for a while, the word without the same exact meaning as we both agree on... well.

Having said that, I will join you in this fight.

See also: exponentially.

Re:Succinct Data Structures by bee_rider on Friday March 07, 2025 @10:19AM (#43290848)
“Exponentially” and “quantum” are the only language hills I’d die on.
Re:Succinct Data Structures by nxobject on Friday March 07, 2025 @07:31PM (#43296325)
Why a quantum leap isn’t the length of an Ångstrom will always sadden me. I’m sure there are other scientific concepts you can use to describe a Great Leap Forward…
Re:Succinct Data Structures by Quekid5 on Saturday March 08, 2025 @08:49AM (#43300222)
I think the Quantum Leap expression can also be understood as a "step" with no intermediate stages, i.e. very abrupt or transformative.
Re:Succinct Data Structures by gwd on Friday March 07, 2025 @03:58PM (#43294570)
Language is defined by its speakers, as basically a "vote". I'm going to keep voting for "literally" meaning "this actually happened" as long as it's practical, because 1) there are dozens of other ways to emphasize something 2) we need some way to say "this is not an exaggeration".