News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Apple M3 Ultra by wtallis on Wednesday March 05, 2025 @09:45PM (#43275814)
The M1 is in a product segment where discrete GPUs have been gone for decades, in favor of integrated graphics that shares one pool of RAM with the CPU. The better question to ask is why Apple kept using that unified memory design even when moving up to larger chips like the M1 Max and M1 Ultra.
Re:Apple M3 Ultra by MBCook on Thursday March 06, 2025 @12:01AM (#43276593)
The GPU is built into the same physical die as the CPU.

So if you wanted to give it a second ram pool you would have to add an entire second memory interface just for the on-die GPU.

Now all you’ve done is make it more complicated, slower because now you have to move things between the two pools, and gained what exactly?

I think it was a very clear and obvious decision to make. It’s an outgrowth out of how the base chips were designed, and it turned out to be extremely handy for some things. Plus since all their modern devices now work this way that probably simplify the software.

I’m not saying it’s genius foresight, but it certainly worked out rather well. There’s nothing stopping them from supporting discreet GPUs too if they wanted to. They just clearly don’t.

Re:Apple M3 Ultra by RachelF on Thursday March 06, 2025 @01:10AM (#43276928)
I'd guess that they inherited it from the iPhone chips. It was nice and fast and also makes Apple a lot of profit as no third party RAM is possible.
Re:Apple M3 Ultra by hot_gril on Thursday March 06, 2025 @02:22AM (#43277394)
They put the M1 into the desktops too