That's funny; they obviously don't have any strategists.

I'm certain they do, however, have folks who dictate policy so they don't lose any donations from certain large foreign orgs.

> That's funny; they obviously don't have any strategists.

They obviously do; they're the folks who, after a few weeks flatfooted, got the Harris campaign to drop stuff that was resonating like the "weird" thing in exchange for "we've got the Cheneys on our side!"

The best thing the democrats could do on strategy would be to blocklist anyone who worked on the Clinton or Harris campaigns.

Both were like watching Asimov try and write an emotional speech. People != robots.

Fair point, I meant good/effective ones.

I mean, I sure wish they had some good ones.

AOC is the future, IMO, if we do, indeed, have a future.