Re:Show HN: PG-Capture – a better way to sync Postgres with ...
by wanderingmind on Tuesday March 04, 2025 @05:00PM
(#43260252)
Hi, congrats on the show HN. Is it possible for you to Provide some comparison of this tool against other existing tools that can sync Postgres to Elastic or other third-party data providers.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Show HN: PG-Capture – a better way to sync Postgres with ...
by nick-keller on Wednesday March 05, 2025 @02:23AM
(#43263842)
I tried to give a detailed comparison with PGSync in another comment. But in a nutshell, PG to Elastic is just one use-case for PG-Capture. The goal for PG-Capture is to be a schema-based Change-Data-Capture utility for Postgres that lets you integrate into your existing stack.
It has no opinion on what you should use to capture low-level events (Debezium, WAL-Listener...) and what you should do with the resulting high-level events (indexation, caching, event bus..).
I am pitching it as a PG to Elastic tool simply because it is a widespread use-case that everyone understands.