Re:Firefly 'Blue Ghost' lunar lander touches down on the moon
by consumer451 on Sunday March 02, 2025 @10:03PM
(#43237860)
This is an interesting tangent. Is it Flickr's copyright rules that make it attractive? Or, something else? Lack of existing competitors? Not associated with a social media account?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Firefly 'Blue Ghost' lunar lander touches down on the moon
by chefandy on Sunday March 02, 2025 @10:26PM
(#43237999)
If you’re going to post albums of high-res photographs on the internet… why not Flickr?
Re:Firefly 'Blue Ghost' lunar lander touches down on the moon
by caycep on Sunday March 02, 2025 @10:41PM
(#43238077)
yea, flickr has always been reliable for this sort of thing
Re:Firefly 'Blue Ghost' lunar lander touches down on the moon
by butlike on Monday March 03, 2025 @10:38AM
(#43242759)
It's a valid question about ToS, and one I'm not sure of.
Re:Firefly 'Blue Ghost' lunar lander touches down on the moon
by chefandy on Monday March 03, 2025 @11:45AM
(#43243633)
Yeah I did a brief scan and a brief search for opinions on their practices when I saw the comment I initially replied to and didn’t find anything concerning. Doesn’t mean there isn’t anything, but it either wasn’t serious enough to be surfaced, or nobody more knowledgeable than me has looked.
Re:Firefly 'Blue Ghost' lunar lander touches down on the moon
by velcrovan on Monday March 03, 2025 @12:40PM
(#43244435)
Because its continued existence has been in grave doubt for years?
I was a heavy Flickr user, but when Yahoo sold it to SmugMug in 2018, I basically assumed it was going to be either merged out of distinct existence or shuttered. I downloaded an archive of all my stuff and stopped using it altogether. Because what’s the point of using a platform that’s so obviously no longer viable…was my thinking at the time. I would never have guessed it would remain alive this long but it’s still not anything I would want to invest time in or rely on anymore.