Re:Show HN: I built a modern Goodreads alternative
by fcarraldo on Sunday March 02, 2025 @01:11PM
(#43233218)
It kind of seems like you use a five-point system, then?
Re:Show HN: I built a modern Goodreads alternative
by BeetleB on Sunday March 02, 2025 @01:53PM
(#43233650)
The difference being that I don't want someone to think that because I rated something 2 out of 5 that I didn't like it because it's less than 2.5. And for most people, a 3/5 doesn't mean "yes, I heartily recommend". But they can believe it for 8/10
(Actually, 7 points as someone else pointed out - by my point stands even with a 7 point system).
Re:Show HN: I built a modern Goodreads alternative
by cAtte_ on Sunday March 02, 2025 @01:27PM
(#43233373)
you use a 7 point system
Re:Show HN: I built a modern Goodreads alternative
by longdustytrail on Monday March 03, 2025 @12:55AM
(#43238726)
I agree with a lot of your top 5 so I’ll try to continue
5: I enjoyed sections of this book but as a whole I didn’t like it
4: had some cool ideas and there were moments when I got excited but the execution wasn’t there. Basically an amateur with a good idea
3: readable but unsatisfying. I finished it but was roasting it in my head the whole time
2: garbage. Bad story idea and bad writing. Nothing good to say except that it seemed like the author was trying
1: offensive. Celebrity cash grabs, polemics, etc. no artistic value whatsoever, author was not trying to write a good book. “Book” is just a format here
I rate for myself, and not others. And for over 20 years I've used a 10 point system.
10 = Easily amongst my favorite
9 = Awesome, but not in all time favorites
8 = Really liked it, and would recommend
7 = Liked it, was worth my time, but not so much that I would happily recommend to others
6 = Liked it, but wasn't worth my time
5 = Neutral
And below 5 I don't distinguish. I randomly pick to indicate I didn't like it.