dimava
I think verifiable game engines are slowly starting to appear. After all, nothing can stop you from unit-testing the game like Factorio does ( https://youtu.be/CgMV2dFFdFE?t=48 ) other then your not bothering to think about it. I have made one even, see https://github.com/Dimava/gensokyo-survivors/tree/master
> this year
Models change so fast now that even "this month" becomes abstract. Everyone, please make sure to mention the name of the model.
That's why Jared didn't consider using it for Bun even if it's undeniably better, they don't have human resources to support it
2. Stock valuation and money are not the same thing. As you could've noticed from the recent Bitcoin price drop, the moment you start selling it it starts to worth less. Tesla is bubble-priced, so it's sell price is at least 5 times less then valuation
3. Even if you get the money, distribution is much harder problem then you think after agreeing with this sensense. IIRC it was Musk who said "So you say you can fix the world hunger for $nnn? Bring me the plan how you are going to do it. Noone brought me a plan so far".
FUNC FACT (N);
NAMES: P; (* variable names *)
1 -> P;
FOR I FROM 1 TO N ::
P * I -> P
DONE (* endif *)
RET: P (* return value *)
END; (* end of function *)
FOR N FROM 0 TO 6 ::
? "FACT(", N, ") = ", FACT(Н) (* print *)
DONE;You could have seen it on some websites already
Cursor docs do say "You get $70 of api priced tokens on $60 tier"
Anthropic limits were 8.33x with free cached tokens, but those numbers themselves were a leak rather then an official statement
Everyone else pays them at API prices
const CatDog = { bark(){}, meow(){} }
and const TreeCat = { bark: "oak", meow(){} }
and your code stops workingTo make types discriminatable you need either
type A = { bark: fn, meow?: never } | { bark?: never, meow: fn }
type B = { species: "dog", bark: fn } | { species: "cat", meow: fn }
or use instanceof with a classANTHROPIC IS GIVING EVERY DECENTLY LARGE MAINTAINER $1000 WORTH OF INFERENCE (~x8 that in API prices)
They likely made a marketing budget for this of $1M or so
Other OSS stuff like Copilot or JetBrains costs to providers much less, $100/yr most (licenses are not expenses, only inference is)
Anthropic may get $500(average total for all 6mo) per user of just inference costs
6 months is because this is experimental and they have no idea what to expect
(their devrel department is meh as you could've noticed already), when they see it working they'll make it autorenew or something
ESR (Eric S.Raymond) asked OpenAI to match and got one, so the same offer from OpenAI will likely follow soon[tm]
And you can only generate like $20 of tokens a month
Cloud tokens made on TPU will always be cheaper and waaay faster then anything you can make at home
> I was running this against my $20/month ChatGPT Plus account
ArXiv CS requires peer review for surveys amid flood of AI-written ones
- nothing happened to preprints
- "summarization" articles always required it, they are just pointing at it out loud
And TPUs are like 5x cheaper then GPUs, per token
Inference is very much profitable
You probably barely remember anything up to around 10, and then each doubling of age adds one logarithmical unit
So 10 is 1, 20 is 2, 40 is 3 and 80 is 4 (or maybe 0, 1 and 2?)
20 is already half of life passed by -_-
Could work I think (be wary of sending .env to the web though)
I think with majority of TypeScript projects using Prettier, 2 is more likely to be the default[0]
The linked page literally says to ignore it [1]
> STOP READING IMMEDIATELY THIS PAGE PROBABLY DOES NOT PERTAIN TO YOU > These are Coding Guidelines for Contributors to TypeScript. This is NOT a prescriptive guideline for the TypeScript community.
4 is a historical thing used as a default for all languages in VSCode [2]
[0] https://prettier.io/docs/options#tab-width
[1] https://github.com/microsoft/TypeScript/wiki/Coding-guidelin...
[2] https://github.com/Microsoft/vscode/issues/41200
Edit: found the TS style guide at https://github.com/basarat/typescript-book/blob/master/docs/... , it should be the correct link
P.S. did send a mail to author hopefully they fix it
They have since unrolled prod/dev db split and dB snapshots And restored that user's db from backup ofc
He has a very distinctive style and large amount of training data from all the reviews and emails he made while collaborating on Linux
And as he manages a huge project that's in development for decades, he has to be very strict about the quality
Add a "Check for updates" button that redirects to chamgelog page in browser for extra points