News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed". Parent comment

Re:The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed" by wyager on Saturday March 01, 2025 @11:54PM (#43227462)
Out of curiosity, how many weeks/months of late vote counting did that take? At the time the election was called, and for at least a couple weeks after iirc, he was ahead.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed" by jghn on Sunday March 02, 2025 @12:06AM (#43227558)
Out of curiosity, why does this matter?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed" by khuey on Sunday March 02, 2025 @12:06AM (#43227561)
Why does it matter how long it took to count all the votes?

If you want to allege election fraud, don't beat around the bush.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed" by sitkack on Saturday March 01, 2025 @11:57PM (#43227488)
The anti-administration votes are split across many candidates, this isn't a tally of Trump vs Kamala.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:The NIH is being slashed and burned, not "reformed" by arp242 on Sunday March 02, 2025 @12:26AM (#43227691)
No, what the previous poster said is that more people voted for other candidates than for Trump, and that's always been pretty clear. 49.8% of the votes went to Trump. That means 50.2% went to other candidates (Harris, Jill Stein, Chase Oliver, etc.)
[ Parent | on HN ]