What more evidence do you need than a WaPo article talking about federal workers that declared they would resist Trump’s policies?
A single article is evidence enough for you. And some people think you are a brilliant lawyer.
A single article is evidence enough for you. And some people think you are a brilliant lawyer.
What more evidence do you need than a WaPo article talking about federal workers that declared they would resist Trump’s policies?
> Your link is an article about people taking Project 2025 and Trump at their word and trying to plan accordingly.
The article is from February 2017. And “trying to plan” what?
> You have no objecticity. Your logic is horribly flawed. You are the problem
Let me ask you a question. You agree that, since Trump won the election, federal employees should work just as hard implementing Project 2025 as they did for Biden, including coming up with creative legal theories like Biden did for student loan forgiveness. Right?