CoPilot for Everything: Training Your AI Replacement One Keystroke at a Time

Re:CoPilot for Everything: Training Your AI Replacement One ... by insamniac on Saturday March 01, 2025 @02:46PM (#43222918)

All humans need to start being compensated for all the data they generate that gets collected. Start giving fractions of stock or whatever for all human input which can now more than ever be endlessly productized.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CoPilot for Everything: Training Your AI Replacement One ... by wombatpm on Saturday March 01, 2025 @04:01PM (#43223646)

Your inherent value as a data source becomes the justification for UBI

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CoPilot for Everything: Training Your AI Replacement One ... by fburnaby on Saturday March 01, 2025 @04:19PM (#43223772)

I do not think this extra justification is necessary, but it is valid.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CoPilot for Everything: Training Your AI Replacement One ... by babyshake on Saturday March 01, 2025 @06:23PM (#43225133)

Incidentally, with the rise of OpenAI as a unicorn Sam Altman has seemed to get a lot less verbal about advocating UBI. Although I may be wrong about that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:CoPilot for Everything: Training Your AI Replacement One ... by Arcuru on Saturday March 01, 2025 @07:04PM (#43225550)

I had a similar thought recently[0], though I was thinking about it more from the copyright side. I think there needs to be some kind of additional tax taken from AI profits, possibly justified by copyrights, because otherwise the economic impact might end up being nuts.

[0] https://jackson.dev/post/generative-ai-and-copyright/

[ Parent | on HN ]