Re:A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his pub...
by JumpCrisscross on Saturday March 01, 2025 @11:19AM
(#43220785)
> they have to be vetted the same way as any other government employee with that access, including security clearances
We know this wasn’t done when they were rummaging around the Treasury. Courts are granting restraining orders because the DOGE bros acted so incompetently. (It’s generally incredibly hard to restrain government employees.)
> it’s not clear how a government employee can have access but for doge it’s breaking the law
Same way a park ranger can’t walk onto a military base and start rummaging through documents. Or start tweeting them. (Or hell, the President himself tweet your tax return.)
Re:A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his pub...
by slashdev on Saturday March 01, 2025 @03:04PM
(#43223100)
> We know this wasn’t done when they were rummaging around the Treasury.
Sorry, do you have a source for that? Having trouble verifying it.
I agree there are standard vetting and security clearances, and they should be followed.
Re:A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his pub...
by JumpCrisscross on Saturday March 01, 2025 @04:03PM
(#43223657)
Item 91 in the EPIC complaint [1], which was found to be sufficiently merited to permit a TRO. (It’s a legal filing. Allegations will always be couched.)
[1] https://epic.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/EPIC-v-OPM-25-cv...
Re:A DOGE staffer appears to be posting DOGE work on his pub...
by jonahbenton on Saturday March 01, 2025 @02:37PM
(#43222823)
They were not vetted/bgchecked, full stop, and are not complying with any security controls. Doing my yearly fedgov security trainings while those fucks are yoloing with all classifications of sensitive data is, shall we say, bitterness inducing.
At least to my mind it’s not clear how a government employee can have access but for doge it’s breaking the law. The devil is in the specific details.